|
About
Who? Why? Goals History Thanks News 2008-04-01: FSF Award 2007-11-20: Case against Iliad (Freebox) 2006-09-22: D-Link court verdict 2006-09-22: D-Link court verdict 2006-02-10: chipkarte.at 2006-02-10: chipkarte.at (German) 2005-06-01: LIDL Notebook 2005-04-30: ALDI Notebooks 2005-04-14: Fortinet Injunction 2005-03-14: CeBIT letter action 2005-02-28: Edimax Technology 2005-02-25: European Commission 2005-02-02: ARP DATACON 2005-01-06: gpl-violations.org logo 2004-12-22: Longshine 2004-10-24: TomTom 2004-10-22: Gigabyte 2004-10-04: FAQs published 2004-10-04: more settlements 2004-06-14: gpl-violations.org / FSF 2004-05-19: Sitecom netfilter / Sitecom netfilter / ASUS GNU GPL FAQs Vendor FAQ Source Code Release FAQ gpl-violations.org FAQ gpl-violations.org Legal FAQ Mailing Lists List Rules announce list tech list legal list Contact webmaster Events Help us Links About website |
gpl-violations.org FAQ
In the situations where violations have been found and action taken enforcement has been successful. This includes out of court settlements with several large vendors and a legal injunction against Sitecom. We strive to resolve issues amicably. When this fails we resolve them through legal actions. At least in Germany yes, and while we've seen scare stories from elsewhere we see no evidence to believe it is not enforceable globally. The goal of gpl-violations is to resolve violations. We recognize that companies make mistakes. We seek amicable solutions whenever possible, but only if that solution resolves the violation. Firstly by not reacting to a technical GPL violation in an extreme fashion. Secondly by checking the violation is indeed a violation. Join the mailing lists, discuss issues there first. Be polite but firm when dealing with companies and remember that the goal is to ensure a company stops violating the GPL and does not violate it again, rather than to leave a smoking crater at the location of their HQ... at least not on the first offense. Keep records of conversations with companies. Co-ordinate with others. A company faced with eight different stories will find it hard to deal with. A company faced with a single accurate information source can respond better. Beware the "public shaming" bomb. It's easy to let off, but very hard to defuse if you made a mistake or the issue turned out to be minor and is rapidly resolved. In addition companies may become very defensive in such cases and decide to "tough it out". We want to build bridges and giving a company no way to avoid losing face hinders that, especially in certain cultures. The gpl-violations.org project keeps track of reported GPL violations in its internal request tracking system. If you want to report an alleged violation, please write to license-violation@gpl-violations.org, and make sure to ``enable --verbose mode'', i.e. include as much details as possible. At this point, gpl-violations.org does not seek donations from individuals. Corporate donations are welcome, please contact Harald Welte in case you're interested. As soon as the project has been incorporated (scheduled for late 2006), we will provide opportunity for individual donations and some form of membership scheme for authors of Free Software who want to |