|
About
Who? Why? Goals History Thanks News 2008-05-28: FSFE FTF 2008-04-01: FSF Award 2007-11-20: Case against Iliad (Freebox) 2006-09-22: D-Link court verdict 2006-09-22: D-Link court verdict 2006-02-10: chipkarte.at 2006-02-10: chipkarte.at (German) 2005-06-01: LIDL Notebook 2005-04-30: ALDI Notebooks 2005-04-14: Fortinet Injunction 2005-03-14: CeBIT letter action 2005-02-28: Edimax Technology 2005-02-25: European Commission 2005-02-02: ARP DATACON 2005-01-06: gpl-violations.org logo 2004-12-22: Longshine 2004-10-24: TomTom 2004-10-22: Gigabyte 2004-10-04: FAQs published 2004-10-04: more settlements 2004-06-14: gpl-violations.org / FSF 2004-05-19: Sitecom netfilter / Sitecom netfilter / ASUS GNU GPL FAQs Vendor FAQ Source Code Release FAQ gpl-violations.org FAQ gpl-violations.org Legal FAQ Mailing Lists List Rules announce list tech list legal list Contact webmaster Events Help us Links About website |
GPL Product Vendor FAQ
This is not legal advice, if you have doubts consult your legal counsel.
Fix it. The same as you would fix a violation of any proprietary software license. Another way of looking at this is to ask the question: would I infringe the copyright of IBM software, or Intel software, or HP software ? Probably not - but if you do so with Linux you are violating Intel, IBM and HP licenses all at the same time. All three have copyright on significant portions of the Linux kernel. So by violating the GPL, you're actually infringing their copyright, too! There are a variety of sources of help and information. The first port of call should probably be your supplier of GPL software components. The GPL license is written to be as clear as possible but a lawyer can be helpful for complex issues like derivative works. Sites such as Sourceforge.net can help by providing a hosting site for GPL versions of software. The big value to the community is having access to the code. One of the most useful things that a company can do therefore is to contribute back changes they made. Putting the software somewhere accessible to all like sourceforge.net is really helpful too. Some vendors try and build communities around the code and get involved, others throw it over the wall and forget about it. No. Your duties are to provide either the source of the GPL components or a written offer included with the product. There is no duty to third parties, there is no duty to support software created using your changes. The GPL also includes warranty disclaimers. In addition the written offer is to provide the source at cost of delivery, not for free. It is possible to meet the license requirements simply by including a copy of the GPL license in the manual, appropriate credit and a zip file of the relevant source on the accompanying CD-ROM to your product. It will only cost you a lot if you set out to violate the license. |